Law is an authoritative driver of human behavior that...

Law is an authoritative driver of human behavior that continues to become heavier through the years. America has been presented to imagine that law is the foundation of freedom, however the ever-changing cultural norms have altered this perspective. People do not confide in their own judgments, or anyone else’s for that matter, therefore society, has established policies and ideologies that let individuals escape their own responsibilities. Something can always be done differently, specifically, when using broader judgments on disputes against the standard norms. What people can sue for establishes boundaries set for the rest of society. In this paper, the case of question three will discuss how authors Howard and Rosenbaum would†¦show more content†¦When it comes to the case of Fred, the father, who assumed that Ella, the daughter, would wear her helmet and pads when skateboarding and failed to do so, then a possible correlation can exist between the shown above exam ple and the case. Meaning that, Fred and Ella assumed the risk both at separate times, but were aware of the consequences if negligent action was followed. However, what he did not acknowledge is the mere fact she may not assume the risk when using her skateboard. Whenever an individual appeals his right to sue, like Fred, it is like placing a cross in the face of Dracula, or the City and Bumpies: individuals just shrivel back in terror because nobody wants to be accused of violating someones rights (Howard, 2004). Howard would say that they have no right to sue, since they assumed the risk of possible injuries or harm when engaging in negligent behaviors. B. Rosenbaum would value moral over legal justice in this case. His sense of direction would shift towards those who come for relief, Fred the father, even though the law fails to support such a necessary moral right of those who have been harmed, and the right to testify to their own injury, like Ella (Nesteruk, 2006). This criti cal loss of freedom leaves the unresolved, Fred and Ella, emotional complexities of unjust harm. Rosenbaum sees the laws renewed and expanded moral role as aiming at the