Friday, February 28, 2020

Anishinaabe social movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Anishinaabe social movements - Essay Example Efforts by the Canadian government to resettle the Anishinabe people so as to limit them to reservations that only handled farming was leading factor to the problems they had to endure. Initially, they practiced fishing and game hunting to support their livelihood. Their land was looted in an effort to force them to other places and pave a way for copper mining. The government promised to pay the Anishinabe once they moved to the reservations. Such promises and those of proper education for their children was not fulfilled hence creating dissatisfaction from the people. Individuals who had also settled on their previous land had made their way into the reserves taking over their source of livelihood. Constructions were built on land destroying fishing sites. The permanent homes they had been promised earlier on were not honored. Equipment and carpentry tools were not also given to the people hence making their lives miserable. The Anishinabe social movements started as a result of su ch issues from the Canadian government (Government of Canada, pg.1). The aboriginal people also commonly referred to as the first people formed a number of social movements to champion for their rights. The Native Americans had been deprived of their land, and most of it given to the British and French Traders. Strict regulations were also put in place so as to curtail the efforts of the First people to get pieces of land. The increasing numbers of settlers in the areas made them push for the Aboriginal people to surrender their land to them. The other reason for the formation of social movements was to advocate for proper education for their children. As it is presently, the First Nations people did not have access to the kind of education the Europeans had. The Indian Act of 1876 had its introduction making it difficult for the First Nations people to get quality education and other social services in the country. Unlike the past treaties that were as a result of negotiations

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Foundations of Microeconomics Consumers and Firms Essay

Foundations of Microeconomics Consumers and Firms - Essay Example The output of the plant is 300,000 units per day at a cost of $30 per unit. The total revenue per day is 300,000 * $30 = $9,000,000. According to Parkin (2005), "A firm shuts down if the price falls below the minimum of average variable cost. The shutdown point is the output and price at which the firm just covers its total variable cost" (p.244). As we can see, the total revenue exceeds the variable costs and it would be recommended to continue to produce. If sales continue to stagnate and drop, there will come a point at which shutdown will be advisable. When sales have reduced to the 250,000 unit level, it will be necessary to begin layoffs. The revenue at that point would be 250,000 * $30 = $7,500,000 and equal to the variable cost. To avoid shutdown, labor costs would need to be reduced. The relationship between a change in price and the change in demand is known as elasticity. If a change in price results in no change in demand, this is known as perfectly inelastic demand (Parkin 2005 p. 84). This would be seen in the market for necessities such as electricity or heating fuel. If the ratio of price change is equal to the change in demand, this is known as unit elastic demand (Parkin 2005 p.84). With some items, such as food, an increase in price only results in a small change in demand. Consumers will cut back, but not eliminate, the product. This is known as inelastic demand (Parkin 2005 p.84). ... The demand change is equal to 10 / 30 * 100 = 33.33%. The change in demand has a larger percentage decrease than the percentage of increase in price and is an elastic demand. Part Three As a policy maker concerned with correcting the effects of gases and particulates emitted by and local power plant, I would first look to command and control regulations. This is the simplest approach for the government and would transfer the cost of reducing the emissions to the consumer and the firm. While this may be the simplest, it may not be acceptable to environmentalists or the parties burdened with the cost. It is also difficult to enforce. Vouchers are another method that should be considered. However, since the problem is a local power plant, the tactic might be ineffective. The firm could purchase vouchers and still continue to discharge pollutants. Charging an emissions fee for the amount discharged may be viewed as a penalty or fine for polluting and would be a cost passed on to the consumers. Taxing the pollutants would have the advantage of providing an economic incentive for compliance. These taxes, known as Pigovian taxes, can be useful in getting a firm to act as if they are bearing the total cost of the externalities (Parkin 2005 p.348). The tax method seems to be the most efficient. Under the tax method, the tax rate is set at the cost of the externalities. The pollutants fall to the point that the cost to produce plus the tax reaches market equilibrium. Polluting above that point raises the cost beyond the marketable price. This would efficiently control the discharge and put the money in the hands of the government to be used to cover the external costs or tax reduction. References Parkin, M. (2005). Microeconomics (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson